Health Insurance Plan Draft Bill Package Analysis

If you have been following the health insurance discussion this past year you will know that the Arkansas Legislative Council hired a healthcare consultant group to make recommendations to improve the plan. Below is the first round of bills based on their recommendations.

Since these bills are drafts and have no numbers assigned I sorted the bills for this analysis in a top/down order with a brief description of the bills title and it’s intent.

Legislative Session Rule Changes

This bill would modify the law so that Health Insurance bills can be run in a fiscal session. Representative Wardlaw has confirmed to us that these bills will be filed and run this fiscal session.

Governance

This bill would create an advisory board for the Board of Finance and EBD. The Board of Finance will remain the governing board. Page 2, line 24 through page 3, line 27 details the make-up and selection process for the public school board side. Page 5, line 9 though page 6, line 11 details the make-up and selection process for the state employee board side. They are both mirrored in size and selection. The Governor(the first year appointments will be selected by the Senate Pro Tempore) will select 3. ASEA will submit 3 applications and 1 will be appointed to the board. One retired state employee(selected by the Speaker of the House in the first year) shall by appointed by the Governor. The last position is the Insurance Department Secretary. All members shall have been in the plan for at least 5 years.

Oversight

The Legislative Council will create the  Employee Benefits Division Oversight Subcommittee. Any changes to your plan design, premium increases or decreases, changes to the pharmacy plan, and anything that has not already been approved will have to be vetted and approved first in this new committee.

Funding

This one page bill removes the states contribution cap. Remember when we worked to have that increased to $550 per employee? This new bill strikes that language and leaves it with no maximum.

Fiscal Impact Statement

Retirement related bills require the Bureau of Legislative Research to attach a written statement on the estimated financial cost before a bill can be run for transparency and analysis. If this bill passes, it will do the same for all public school and state employees health insurance related bills.

Funding Mechanism Trigger

This would create an alarm if EBD’s reserve balance dips below 12%(balance, minus the claims, calculated as a percentage of expenses) and that EBD would immediately have to report to the new sub-committee as to what is the problem.

Obesity Program

The plan previously had a cap on how many people could get into the Bariatric program.  The consultants were adamant that these programs reduce expenses over time. This bill removes that cap.

Retiree Participation

Going forward, for retirees to participate in the health insurance program must have been in the program for at least 5 years.

What You Do Not See In These Bills

The promise we received is that retirees can opt out of the MAPD plan and return to the State’s plan. That will be discussed  this Thursday, 10AM, during the Arkansas Legislative Council(ALC) meeting with the consultant group. All things point to getting our promise in writing. ASEA will be there. Representative Wardlaw has invited us to testify if needed. https://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/

Summary

These bills provide the needed transparency, oversight, resources, and financial distress alarms that were not previously in place. We are endorsing the package as written. We will continue monitoring them as it moves through the legislative process.

If you would like to see these bills, you can request a copy by emailing jbridges@aseaar.org.

John Bridges, Director, Arkansas State Employees Association

Senate Bill 162

SB162 – TO AMEND THE LAW CONCERNING THE TERMINATION PERIOD REQUIRED FOR RETIREMENT UNDER THE ARKANSAS PUBLIC EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM; AND TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY.

https://www.arkleg.state.ar.us/Bills/Detail?id=SB162&chamber=Senate&ddBienniumSession=2021%2F2021R

ASEA’s interpretation is that it would allow retired employees with specialized knowledge to return to work when needed like in a legislative session.

Results of today’s EBD meeting

Today in the EBD board meeting they adopted the new proposals from yesterday’s insurance committee meeting as they were stated. 

In case you missed it in our Facebook post, here they are:

• Delay moving to Medicare D for one year.

• 65 and older will receive a 5% premium increase.

• Those who voluntarily move to Medicare D this year will receive a $25 monthly premium discount.

ASEA is working on creating a focus group made up of retirees to research options to help keep the fund financially stable. There was also discussion from the EBD board about starting working on the plan and a detailed report to include breaking the data out into tiers, and providing a timeline in advance of their October meeting so they all have time to think on it and try to come up with ideas.

Check out tomorrow’s newspaper, our Executive Director John Bridges may be quoted. Here’s what he said:

What we’ve heard from the retired members of ASEA is that they are happy with the support they received in yesterday’s insurance committee meeting and most will likely be ok with today’s EBD board decision to delay removing them this year from the state’s pharmacy plan. In the span of a year, retired state employees have had to fight to keep their retirement benefit whole and now their health insurance benefit was almost reduced, so many say they feel like they are being singled out.

ASEA will form its own focus group made up of retirees from across the state to find alternative solutions to hopefully help improve the financial stability of the plan. Then they will present it to EBD and the Insurance committee that is tasked with trying to keep the plan stable beyond 2022. We look forward to working with all parties involved with this issue.